Contact Us Quantum Login
01925 737 698

Procurement for Housing
2 Olympic Way, Woolston Grange Avenue
Birchwood, Warrington, WA2 0YL

24-hour emergency repairs under Awaab's Law: When every hour counts

Understanding what constitutes an emergency, how to respond within 24 hours, and which contractors can actually deliver when it matters most

Twenty-four hours. That’s the timeframe social landlords are working within when there are reasonable grounds to believe a reported problem could present an emergency hazard under Awaab’s Law.

Potential emergency hazards must be investigated as soon as reasonably practicable and within 24 hours of the landlord becoming aware of them. If the investigation confirms an emergency hazard, the necessary safety work must also be completed within that 24-hour period.

If the property cannot be made safe within the required timeframe, the landlord must offer suitable alternative accommodation at its own expense until the necessary safety work has been completed.

That makes emergency response about much more than carrying out a repair. Housing providers need to be able to identify potential emergencies, investigate them quickly, make decisions, mobilise the appropriate people and contractors and support residents, at any time of day.

This guide looks at how the 24-hour emergency process works and the systems, people and supply chain providers need to respond effectively.

The challenge of a 24-hour response

Emergency hazards leave very little room for delay.

A potential emergency could be reported in the evening, at a weekend or on a bank holiday. Providers therefore need arrangements that work outside normal office hours as well as during the working day.

That means being able to assess and investigate potential emergency hazards quickly, make decisions, mobilise the appropriate response and, where necessary, arrange suitable alternative accommodation.

The challenge isn’t simply having an emergency repairs number. It’s making sure the whole response can operate effectively within the 24-hour timeframe.

What constitutes an emergency: the decision that defines everything

Under Awaab’s Law, an emergency hazard is a hazard that poses an imminent and significant risk of harm to the health or safety of the occupier.

When a potential hazard is reported, the landlord may not immediately have enough information to determine whether it meets that threshold. The first priority is therefore to recognise when there are reasonable grounds to believe a potential emergency hazard exists and make sure it is investigated within the required timeframe.

The investigation should establish the nature and extent of the hazard, the risk it presents to the people living in the home and whether it should be treated as an emergency hazard.

This distinction is important. Initial reports may be incomplete, and the seriousness of a hazard can depend on both the condition of the property and the individual circumstances of the resident.

Where there are reasonable grounds to suspect an emergency hazard, providers need to respond accordingly rather than waiting for the normal significant-hazard investigation process.

Assessing the risk of a potential emergency hazard

Determining whether a hazard presents an imminent and significant risk requires consideration of both the condition of the property and the circumstances of the people living there.

There isn’t a single checklist that will determine whether every case is an emergency. The available evidence needs to be considered together.

Consider the nature and severity of the hazard

Look at factors such as:

Consider exposure

The location and extent of the hazard can affect the level of risk.

Consider:

Consider the resident’s individual circumstances

A hazard may present a greater risk to some residents than others.

Providers should consider relevant information about the people living in the home where it could affect the potential for harm. This could include age, disability, health conditions or other individual circumstances relevant to the particular hazard.

The purpose isn’t to make a medical diagnosis or assume that particular groups automatically make a case an emergency. It is to understand the risk the specific hazard presents to the people actually living in the property.

Consider how immediate the risk is

A key question is whether the hazard presents a risk that requires action within the emergency timeframe rather than following the process for a significant hazard.

Consider whether:

The assessment and the evidence supporting it should be clearly recorded.

Examples of situations that may require an emergency response

Whether a particular case meets the definition of an emergency hazard will depend on the circumstances. However, some reports should immediately raise concern and trigger rapid assessment and investigation.

The following examples illustrate the types of factors providers may need to consider.

Extensive mould affecting a child’s bedroom

A family reports extensive mould across the walls and ceiling of a child’s bedroom. The child is experiencing respiratory symptoms and the family has stopped using the room.

Factors to consider include:

Water ingress affecting the structure or electrical installations

Significant water ingress is causing plaster to deteriorate and moisture is affecting electrical fittings.

Factors to consider include:

Serious contamination

A drainage failure has caused sewage-contaminated water to enter occupied areas of the home.

Factors to consider include:

Cases where the level of risk may be less immediately clear

Other reports may require rapid investigation before it is possible to determine whether the hazard is significant or an emergency.

For example, mould in a bathroom, damp around electrical fittings, a roof leak or a ventilation failure could present very different levels of risk depending on the extent of the problem, the likelihood of deterioration, the areas affected and the circumstances of the resident.

The important point is not to classify a hazard based on its name alone. Providers need to consider the evidence and the risk presented in the individual case.

Making decisions under pressure

Potential emergency hazards may need to be assessed quickly and sometimes with limited information.

Frontline teams don’t necessarily need to make a final technical judgement when a report first comes in. Their role may instead be to recognise the indicators of a potentially serious risk, gather the right information and escalate the case quickly to someone with the appropriate competence and authority.

A practical approach to initial decision-making

1. Gather the essential information

Establish what has happened, which parts of the home are affected, who may be exposed and whether there are indications of an immediate risk to health or safety.

2. Look for indicators of a potential emergency

Consider the severity of the reported problem, whether the situation is deteriorating, whether residents can safely avoid the affected area and any individual circumstances that may increase the potential for harm.

3. Escalate uncertainty quickly

Where the available information gives reasonable grounds to believe there may be an emergency hazard, the case should be escalated for appropriate investigation rather than delayed while frontline staff try to reach a definitive diagnosis.

4. Make sure the right person can make the decision

Providers should have clear escalation routes so that someone with the appropriate competence and authority can assess the available evidence and determine the response required.

5. Record the evidence and decisions

Record the information received, the assessment made, who made or reviewed the decision and the reasons for the action taken.

Good records help maintain continuity as the case moves between teams and provide an audit trail of how the provider responded.

The 24-hour requirement: what needs to happen?

Where there are reasonable grounds to believe a potential emergency hazard exists, the landlord must investigate as soon as reasonably practicable and within 24 hours of becoming aware of it.

If the investigation confirms an emergency hazard, the landlord must carry out the relevant safety work as soon as reasonably practicable and within that same 24-hour period.

This doesn’t necessarily mean completing every piece of work required to permanently resolve the underlying problem within 24 hours.

The immediate requirement is to complete the work needed to make the home safe from the emergency hazard.

If the home can be made safe

Relevant safety work should remove or reduce the immediate risk sufficiently to make the home safe for the resident.

What that involves will depend on the hazard and the findings of the investigation. In some cases, safety work may resolve the problem completely. In others, further remedial or preventative work may still be required to address the underlying cause and prevent the hazard from recurring.

If the home cannot be made safe

If the necessary safety work cannot be completed within the required timeframe, the landlord must offer the resident suitable alternative accommodation at the landlord’s expense.

That accommodation will be required until the relevant safety work has been completed and the home can be safely occupied.

What making the property safe could involve

The safety work required will depend on the nature and severity of the hazard, the findings of the investigation and the circumstances of the resident. There isn’t a standard set of measures that will be appropriate in every case. However, depending on the circumstances, potential interventions could include:

For serious damp and mould

Where damp and mould presents an immediate risk, potential safety measures could include:

These measures may make the home safe from the immediate hazard, but further work may still be required to identify and address the underlying cause of the damp and mould and prevent it from returning.

For water ingress with structural or electrical risks

Potential safety measures could include:

Further investigation and permanent repairs may then be required to address the underlying defect.

For sewage or serious contamination

Potential safety measures could include:

Where the contamination cannot be controlled sufficiently to allow the resident to remain safely in the home, suitable alternative accommodation may be required.

Safety work should reflect the evidence

These are examples rather than a prescribed Awaab’s Law checklist.

The appropriate response should be determined by the investigation findings, the nature of the hazard and the risk it presents to the resident. Providers should be able to demonstrate why the measures taken were considered sufficient to make the home safe.

What does “safe” mean in practice?

Making a property safe means addressing the emergency risk sufficiently so that the resident is no longer exposed to the imminent and significant risk of harm identified through the investigation.

The action required will vary from case to case, but providers should consider whether:

A temporary measure can form part of the response where it genuinely makes the home safe. It shouldn’t simply conceal the problem or delay work that is necessary to remove the immediate risk.

Making the property safe also doesn’t necessarily mean the underlying cause has been permanently resolved. Where further remedial or preventative work is required, that work should be identified and managed separately within the applicable Awaab’s Law timescales.

If the property cannot be made safe: alternative accommodation

Where an emergency hazard has been identified and the necessary safety work cannot be completed within the required timeframe, the landlord must offer the resident suitable alternative accommodation at its own expense.

What is suitable will depend on the circumstances of the household as well as the likely duration of the stay.

Household needs

When arranging alternative accommodation, providers should consider factors such as:

Location and accessibility

The location of alternative accommodation can have a significant impact on residents, particularly where they may need to stay away from their home for more than a short period.

Depending on the circumstances, considerations could include:

It may not always be possible to meet every preference at short notice, particularly in an emergency, but providers should take the household’s individual circumstances into account when determining whether accommodation is suitable.

How long will alternative accommodation be needed?

The resident may need to remain in alternative accommodation until the relevant safety work has been completed and the home can be safely occupied.

Providers should keep residents informed about:

Where further remedial or preventative work remains after the emergency safety work has been completed, providers will also need to consider whether that work can be carried out safely with the resident back in the property.

Planning for emergency accommodation

Finding suitable alternative accommodation at short notice can be one of the most challenging parts of an emergency response.

Availability may be particularly difficult outside normal working hours, for larger households or where residents have specific accessibility, health or support requirements.

Providers therefore need to understand what accommodation options are available across the areas in which they operate and how those options can be accessed quickly when required.

Potential accommodation options

Depending on the provider, location and needs of the household, options could include:

Don’t rely on a single option

Emergency accommodation needs can vary considerably. An option that works for one household may be unsuitable for another.

Providers should therefore consider having access to a range of accommodation options, with clear arrangements for who can authorise and book them outside normal working hours.

Regularly reviewing availability, contact details and booking arrangements can help make sure those options work when they are actually needed.

Coordinating an emergency response

Meeting a 24-hour emergency timeframe isn’t simply about having a contractor available. Providers need to be able to coordinate decisions, people, contractors and resident support quickly, including outside normal working hours.

24/7 decision-making capability

Someone with the appropriate responsibility and authority needs to be available to make or escalate urgent decisions when an emergency occurs.

Depending on the situation, this could include authority to:

Clear out-of-hours delegations and escalation routes can prevent valuable time being lost waiting for approval.

Rapid contractor mobilisation

Emergency contractors need to be capable of responding within the timescales required by the individual case.

Providers should understand:

A contractor offering a 24/7 telephone number isn’t necessarily the same as having the operational capability to mobilise the appropriate people, equipment and materials at short notice.

Multi-trade and specialist coordination

Some emergency hazards may require several different disciplines.

For example, significant water ingress could require input from a building contractor, electrician, drying specialist or structural professional. A serious damp and mould case may require investigation, treatment and work to address an underlying building defect.

Providers should be clear about who is responsible for coordinating those different activities and making sure information moves between everyone involved.

Resident communication and support

An emergency in someone’s home can be extremely disruptive and stressful.

Residents should receive clear information about:

Communication should take account of any accessibility, language or other individual requirements.

Where several teams or contractors are involved, providers should also consider giving the resident a clear point of contact so they aren’t left trying to coordinate the response themselves.

Documentation and reporting requirements

The speed of an emergency response doesn’t remove the need for clear records.

Providers should be able to demonstrate what was reported, how the risk was assessed, what the investigation found, and what action was taken to make the home safe.

What should be recorded during an emergency response?

Depending on the circumstances, records could include:

Initial report and assessment

Investigation and decision-making

Emergency response

Further action

Providing the written summary

Following the investigation, the landlord must provide the resident with a written summary of its findings within the applicable timeframe.

For an emergency hazard, this should clearly explain:

The written summary should usually be provided within three working days of the investigation concluding.

Emergency action may happen very quickly, but residents should still receive a clear record of what was found, what has been done and what will happen next.

What to look for in an emergency response contractor

A contractor describing its service as “24/7” doesn’t necessarily mean it has the operational capacity to investigate, mobilise resources and carry out appropriate safety work at short notice.

Providers therefore need to understand what sits behind a contractor’s emergency response offer and whether it can support the response arrangements required across their stock.

Genuine 24/7 availability

Emergency availability needs to extend beyond having someone available to answer the telephone.

Depending on the services being provided, consider whether the contractor has:

Test the response model, not just the service description

Providers should test what a contractor’s stated emergency service means operationally.

Useful questions could include:

Testing these arrangements before they are needed can expose gaps that aren’t obvious from a stated “24/7 emergency service”.

Rapid mobilisation capacity

Being available is only part of emergency response. Contractors also need sufficient capacity to mobilise the right people, equipment and materials when an urgent case arises.

Resources and resilience

Depending on the services required, providers should consider whether contractors have:

Providers should consider not only the contractor’s normal capacity but what happens when demand is at its highest.

Technical competence for emergency work

Speed shouldn’t come at the expense of safety or quality.

The competence required will depend on the nature of the work being carried out. Depending on the services commissioned, this could include:

Providers should make sure that the people carrying out the work have the appropriate competence for the task rather than assuming that a general emergency repairs capability covers every type of hazard.

Experience of working with residents

Technical capability is only one part of an effective emergency response.

Contractors may be entering someone’s home at a stressful and disruptive time, potentially outside normal working hours and where the household has already experienced significant concern about the condition of their home.

Providers should therefore consider contractor capability in areas such as:

These expectations should form part of the service requirements and contractor performance arrangements rather than relying on individual operatives to interpret them differently.

How to assess emergency contractor capability

Contractor claims about emergency response should be tested against the service you actually need.

Whether reviewing an existing contract or procuring a new service, asking detailed questions can help establish whether the contractor has the people, equipment, geographic coverage and resilience to support your emergency response arrangements.

Availability and mobilisation

Ask:

Workforce and capacity

Ask:

Equipment and materials

Ask:

Where the service includes damp, mould or water-related emergencies, providers may also want to establish what access the contractor has to appropriate drying, dehumidification, air-cleaning, moisture monitoring and containment equipment.

Technical competence

Ask:

The appropriate answers will depend on the services being commissioned. Providers should avoid treating a single qualification or accreditation as evidence that a contractor can manage every type of emergency hazard.

Geographic coverage

Ask:

Test the evidence

Where emergency response is a critical part of the service, providers may want to go beyond written assurances.

This could include reviewing performance data, checking out-of-hours escalation arrangements, testing contact routes, examining examples of previous emergency mobilisation and incorporating response requirements into contract performance measures.

The objective isn’t simply to establish whether a contractor offers an emergency service. It’s to understand whether the service is sufficiently robust to support the provider’s own Awaab’s Law response arrangements.

Out-of-hours response: when normal working arrangements don’t apply

Potential emergency hazards can be reported at any time. Where there are reasonable grounds to believe an emergency hazard may exist, the required response cannot simply wait for normal office hours to resume.

Providers therefore need out-of-hours arrangements that allow potential emergencies to be identified, escalated, investigated and acted upon without avoidable delay.

The important question is whether the same critical decisions and actions that are available at 2pm on a Tuesday can still happen at 10pm on a Saturday.

Decision-making authority

Out-of-hours teams need clear authority and escalation routes.

Depending on the organisation’s arrangements, this could include the ability to:

Delegations should be clearly documented so staff understand what they can authorise and when a case needs to be escalated.

Access to specialist resources

Emergency response may require several different people or services, and those resources may be more difficult to access outside normal working hours.

Providers should consider how they would access:

Where the response depends on third parties, their actual out-of-hours availability should be understood rather than assumed.

Coordinating multiple services

Some emergencies may require several organisations or trades to work together.

Providers should establish who takes responsibility for coordinating the response out of hours, particularly where normal contract managers, surveyors or operational teams may not be available.

That person needs access to sufficient information to understand what has already happened, what actions are underway and what still needs to be done.

Resident communication and support

Residents experiencing an emergency outside normal working hours should still be able to understand what is happening and how they will be supported.

Out-of-hours arrangements should consider:

The handover between out-of-hours and daytime teams is particularly important. Residents shouldn’t have to start again and explain the entire situation each time responsibility passes to another team.

Will your out-of-hours response work when you need it?

Having an emergency number, contractor arrangements and access to alternative accommodation doesn’t necessarily mean the complete response will work effectively out of hours.

Providers should consider testing the process from the point a resident first reports a potential emergency through to investigation, decision-making, safety work and, where required, alternative accommodation.

Test the complete journey

A practical exercise could test:

Test the points most likely to fail

Providers should pay particular attention to dependencies on individuals or single suppliers.

For example:

Use testing to improve the process

Desktop exercises, simulated emergency scenarios and periodic checks of contact and escalation routes can help identify gaps before they affect a real resident.

Where contractors or accommodation providers form part of the response, they should be included in appropriate testing rather than assessing the landlord’s internal process in isolation.

Any weaknesses identified should feed back into procedures, training, contract management and contingency arrangements.

The aim is to test the complete response, not simply whether each individual component exists.

The true cost of out-of-hours emergency response

Emergency work can cost significantly more than planned maintenance.

Out-of-hours labour, specialist equipment, rapid mobilisation, temporary accommodation and the need to coordinate several services at short notice can all increase the cost of responding.

That doesn’t change the requirement to make the home safe, but it does mean providers need to understand the potential financial impact and build emergency response into their budgets and procurement arrangements.

Premium rates for emergency work

Emergency call-outs can cost 1.5–3 times normal rates, depending on the timing, service and complexity of the response.

Indicative cost pressures can include:

Actual rates will depend on the contractual arrangements in place, which makes understanding emergency pricing before an incident occurs particularly important.

Alternative accommodation costs

Where a home cannot be made safe within the required timeframe, alternative accommodation can add significantly to the overall cost of the response.

For example, hotel accommodation for a household can cost around £100-£400+ per night, depending on location, household size, availability and the accommodation required.

Costs can increase further where:

This is another reason why having access to a range of accommodation options can be valuable rather than relying solely on last-minute hotel bookings.

Wider response costs

The direct repair or safety work may represent only part of the total cost.

An emergency response can also require:

Understanding these wider costs can help providers budget more realistically for emergency response and assess where stronger preventative maintenance or earlier intervention could reduce future expenditure.

Managing emergency response costs

The priority in an emergency is making sure residents are safe. However, providers can still take steps to manage the cost of emergency response without compromising safety or the required timescales.

Agree emergency arrangements in advance

Where emergency services are likely to be required, procurement and contract arrangements can establish:

Having these arrangements in place can reduce the need to source services and agree commercial terms while an emergency is already underway.

Invest in preventative maintenance

Reducing the number of problems that develop into emergencies can be more effective than simply improving the response once they occur.

Repairs history, stock condition information and recurring reports can help identify properties or components where earlier intervention may reduce future risk.

Intervene before problems escalate

Reports that don’t initially meet the threshold for an emergency can still deteriorate.

Effective investigation, appropriate repairs and follow-up can help prevent significant hazards developing into emergency situations that are more disruptive for residents and more expensive to resolve.

Make the response process efficient

Clear decision-making, established contractor arrangements and good information can reduce avoidable delays and duplication.

Providers should look for points in the process where time and cost are lost through repeated visits, unclear responsibilities, unavailable information or unnecessary handovers.

Plan alternative accommodation strategically

Relying on last-minute accommodation can limit choice and increase costs.

Having access to a range of accommodation options can give providers greater flexibility to find suitable accommodation for different households while managing the financial impact of emergency placements.

Look beyond the individual emergency

Emergency-response data can also help identify wider patterns.

Repeated emergency call-outs involving the same properties, components, hazards or underlying causes may indicate where targeted investment or changes to planned maintenance could reduce future risk and cost.

The objective isn’t simply to make each emergency cheaper. It’s to reduce avoidable emergencies while making sure the resources needed for genuine emergency hazards are available when residents need them.

Accessing emergency response services through PfH

Building a resilient emergency response can require access to several different services – from damp and mould treatment and specialist investigation through to electrical works, contamination control and other technical support.

PfH’s procurement solutions can help members access suppliers across a range of services that may form part of their Awaab’s Law response.

Compliance Solutions Framework

PfH’s Compliance Solutions Framework includes services that can support providers in investigating and responding to damp, mould and other property-related hazards.

Relevant areas include:

Damp and mould treatment

Where emergency safety work involves serious damp or mould, providers may need access to specialist treatment and remediation services.

Depending on the nature of the case, services could include:

Damp treatment and associated works

Where water ingress or excess moisture is contributing to the hazard, appropriate services may include:

Surveying and investigation

Some cases may require specialist surveying or investigation before the appropriate safety or remedial work can be determined.

Access to additional investigation capacity can also help providers where internal teams are dealing with peaks in demand or cases requiring specialist expertise.

Fully managed solutions

More complex cases may involve several different activities or trades.

A managed service approach can help coordinate investigation, treatment, remedial work, resident communication and other activities where a provider requires a more integrated response.

Supporting compliance services

Depending on the nature of the hazard, providers may also need access to other specialist services, including areas such as:

Check the emergency response capability you require

Access to a framework doesn’t in itself remove the need to establish whether a supplier can meet your specific emergency response requirements.

When using a framework to support Awaab’s Law arrangements, providers should consider requirements such as:

These requirements can then be reflected in the way services are specified, evaluated and managed.

PfH can help members understand the procurement options available and identify the most appropriate route for the services they need.

Building resilient emergency contractor arrangements

Where providers expect to rely on external contractors for emergency response, the arrangements need to work before an emergency occurs.

Agreeing the practical and commercial details in advance can reduce the number of decisions that need to be made while the 24-hour timeframe is already running.

What could be agreed in advance?

Depending on the service and procurement route, arrangements could cover:

Providers should also be clear about which responsibilities sit with the landlord and which sit with the contractor.

Geographic coverage matters

A supplier’s overall geographic coverage doesn’t necessarily tell you how quickly it can respond to every property.

Providers should understand:

For organisations operating across several regions, the appropriate solution may involve more than one supplier or delivery model.

Plan for peaks in demand

Emergency response capacity may also change as demand increases.

Periods of severe weather, widespread building defects or seasonal increases in damp and mould reports could place several providers on the same supply chain at the same time.

Providers should therefore consider:

Monitor whether the arrangements still work

Emergency arrangements shouldn’t be treated as something that is agreed once and then assumed to remain effective for the life of the contract.

Providers can use contract management to monitor areas such as:

Periodic testing can also help confirm that emergency contact routes, escalation arrangements and contractor availability continue to operate as expected.

The objective is to build enough resilience into the service that the provider isn’t dependent on a single person, team or contractor being available every time an emergency occurs.

Reviewing your emergency response capability

With the first phase of Awaab’s Law now in force, providers should be reviewing how their emergency response arrangements are working in practice.

The question isn’t simply whether a policy or process exists. It’s whether the organisation can consistently identify a potential emergency hazard, investigate it and, where an emergency hazard is confirmed, complete the necessary safety work within the required timeframe.

A practical review should consider the complete journey from the resident’s first report through to investigation, safety work, communication and follow-up.

Review your reporting and triage process

Consider whether:

Review decision-making and escalation

Check whether:

Review contractor and specialist capacity

Establish whether your current arrangements provide access to:

This should be based on the capability available in practice, not simply what the contract or service description says.

Review alternative accommodation arrangements

Check how quickly suitable alternative accommodation could be arranged for different types of household.

Consider scenarios involving:

The objective is to understand where the process may become difficult before an emergency occurs.

Review records and resident communication

Providers should also consider whether their systems allow them to maintain a clear record of:

Residents should receive clear and consistent information throughout the process, including when responsibility moves between teams or contractors.

Use real cases to identify weaknesses

Actual emergency cases can provide some of the most useful evidence about whether the process is working.

Reviewing cases can help identify recurring issues such as:

The purpose shouldn’t simply be to establish whether an individual case met the required timeframe. It should be to understand why the response worked or where it became difficult, and use that evidence to improve the system.

Awaab’s Law compliance should therefore be treated as an ongoing operational process rather than a one-off implementation exercise.

Strengthen your Awaab’s Law emergency response

Responding effectively to an emergency hazard requires more than an out-of-hours repairs service. Providers need the right investigation capability, specialist contractors, clear escalation routes, suitable accommodation options and sufficient resilience to respond when demand increases.

PfH can help members review their procurement requirements and access solutions that support different parts of their Awaab’s Law response.

Whether you need to strengthen an existing contract, access additional specialist capacity or procure a new service, our team can help you identify the most appropriate procurement route.

Speak to us today about the procurement solutions available to support your Awaab’s Law response.

Related Awaab’s Law resources

Continue exploring our practical guidance on Awaab’s Law: